Of the Once and Future West:
Towards a Homeland
Migration and a New Ethno-State
Achilles Triumphant ~ Howard David Johnson
The Beginnings of Ethnic Revolution
The great epilogues of all great attempts are followed closely by confusion, fear, uncertainty, and hope in a better tomorrow. This experience is not limited to persons of the West, and may be charted with certainty by historians and demographers alike. The majority of this continuing discussion will center on America, her Western people; not its historicity of mechanism, this is only the superficial ‘history’ of its past. What we are to discuss is the Future. The future of a people tossed in a tempest of changing mores, political agendas and wayward spiritual values; a course charted by ‘circumstance’ and the loss of memory ~ the loss of~ Identity ~
Let us, then, dig deeper, and broaden our basis for the concepts of Land, and the need to claim our own unique, and lasting place to live.
Each race-culture has its own new, unique, and potential possibilities for self-expression, which arise, live their own life, and fall away into distraction and ultimate death, never to return in the original form in which they were first created. There is no single painting, no single work in stone, no single formulae encompassing all mathematics, no one science of physics, of metaphysics, but many, each in its singular and expressive essence, limited in duration and self-contained, just as each species of plant has its peculiar smell or fruit, its unique and singular type of birth and passing. These independent cultures, these sublime life-essences, grow with the same superb arbitrary nature as the flowers and organic life, of the wild, un-inhabited veld. They belong, like the plants and the animals, to the living nature of the poet, of Goethe; not to the lineal nature of Science. I see the organism of the West as an ongoing mosaic of endless formations and re-formations, of the rising and setting of organic forms. The ‘professional’ historian, to be sure, sees this process as a sort of ‘mythical’ metaphysics, adding little to the process of ‘reason’, one epilogue after another, but counting only duration and numerical certainty helps very little when dealing with real life, with transformation.
The passing of the ‘true’ Classical civilization of Greece, to the comprehensive Roman civilization was such a transformation. One being bourne by poetics, and one by science; by a purely mental, arbitrary, and rootless experiment. Like our own Republic, we started out pursuing the ‘classical’ reasoning of our ancestors; later, however, after the great ‘civil’ War, we slowly passed into the realm of theoretics, arbitrary, and devoid of Western roots.
There is no ‘mythos’, no Saga, no Songs of what we once were; only the ever present need to belong to the mechanism, the machine of ‘law’, and to those ends which law produces – Institution. In the classical world, laws were arbitrary too, and based on the pantheon of gods, and their needs; secular laws, then, being based on the perception of ‘aspects of the god-heads’. This, of course, a distillation of both the ‘greek’ race-soul, and the roman cold-fast intellect, and this antithesis describes, precisely, the unique difference between what we call the race-culture and that of civilization. It is this difference, this type, which is compared with the intellectual and metaphysical man, or Age if you will. This contest is always found at the very epilogue of each recurring nexus, or birthing of a new culture, at the expense of ‘civilization. Such are the great epochs of Sargon, Menes, Ming, Alexander, and Caesar.
In these late periods of the classical world, just as today, do we also see the new ‘faiths’ of the ‘stoics’, and of Social-ism, and ‘magianism’ of foreign Levantine thought, cabbalism, and Moorish imperialism (casting aside the metaphysics of Zarathustra and Eckardt for these alien forms). All these, ‘faiths’, which are induced into the Western mind, just as it has become a moribund creature, ripe for such transformation into a new type of being. The old, tired logos, being torn down, and remolded into a ‘civilization’ different from what had gone before. The people, as well, of course, of a new character. The Old, making way for the New.
Why the zeal, then, of those of Western stock, who demand that this transformation occur at all? After all, is not the wealth, the distinction, the rightness of the past, in all its technics, not enough to hold each to the other? Apparently not. Greater and greater demands are made upon the ‘state’, by those who once stood on their own; like their ancestors, those who stood proud on their own territory, each holding a part of the organism entire; this was a shared duty amongst those who shared in this existence, and were proud to emulate those who came before. Not now – now is the time of the great breaking, the forging of new directives, of new priorities and new expressions of freedom. Or so we are told.
The Freedom to move, to search the farthest horizon, has always been the higher goal of Western man; it is, as always, the Faustian spirit – that which seeks to go beyond itself. Rome, for instance, was not necessarily the ‘imperial rome’ many would have us believe; they settled only conquered territory; they simply protected ‘possessions’ attained by them. Our republic, on the other hand, has become, as represented by our own unique hubris, begun that long, tedious, and dysfunctional path, of true imperialism – the Nationalist wants none of this reckoning – he only wants enough to consider his needs, and the needs of his own kind. This, in the final analysis, is the Territorial Imperative.
However, there is more.
The search for Land is over – for there is none left; with the exception of Alaska (and this only in a relative sense, as we have, in fact, laid claim to it) and parts of Canada. The insertion of the existing ideas of a Pax Americanum, the broadest of ideals, which would include all of South America is, to only of the few Ã©lite’s, a non-issue; but Land, usable and healthy, remains in abundance in the existing confines of the ‘american’ dream.
The move into the Northwest region of this continental habitation is still a vigorous idea within the hearts and minds of millions of Western stock. To be sure, there are detractors, even within nationalist circles, but these will yield as the momentum of the Presidential elections of the Year 2008 come into clear relief (no matter who is elected); soon, the driving force behind all the intellectual primers abounding on this issued will be pushed to the background in favor of getting on a ship, any ship but the coming ‘ship-of-state’ – it makes no matter who is elected, as the decision to finally disenfranchise those sons and daughters of the West is a certainty. Those who care for our People will, when the time comes, take up the mantle hesitantly, but will take it up.
A Territorial Imperative is the only real security by which Western peoples, your People, may remain free; it is the only Homeland, which, truly, can be your home and land. The United States, the hearth and home of many sons and daughters of the West, and an integral part of the Race Culture, is also traveling through a revival, a renaissance which will surprise many. America is unavoidably being drawn into the same awareness, as is the European commonwealth. How we, as a People and ‘political technic’ deal with this eventuality is what will determine our future – it is the presence of our Tomorrow. As always, any race-cultural revival is purely cultural, that is, spiritual, almost intangible, and is seen only with the ‘eyes that see’. Many have seen the trends; many have experienced the Modern’s vision of the future. Those that share this reality are already demanding separatism at once. Those, which advocate complete ‘separation’, are small, numbering only a few million [many who feel this way, and lack any real substantive ability to show this feeling are, nevertheless, manifest; the ‘common man’ has no real way to share with his fellows in the present climate of political control – dissent appears not to exist]. However small, one may use these numbers as an indicator of a reality, rather than an existing, functioning, reality. In any event, if any so-called ‘rainbow’ coalition becomes dominant in the future, with or without the aid of the present government, it is a foregone conclusion that opposing Western technics of the same caliber will be manifest.
The modern conservative cannot conceive of any separate nation on this continent, yet he is coercing, intimidating, and fomenting this exact phenomenon in Europe at this very date. He calls it the great coming of ‘democracy’ in once totalitarian systems, while he, at the same time, practices the same totalitarian dictatorship here at home. The Modern is a hypocrite. His hypocrisy stems from the original idea of universalism – of all beings being brothers in the sense of ‘community’. His idea, or more rightly, the ‘idea’ of Montesquieu, was the crystal clear rationalism of separation of powers, a separate but equal idea which has been discounted by the Modern in every other sphere of political dialogue in this century, to accommodate a smooth transition into the realm of a living world. Like all rationalistic thinkers, however, its reality of life-process is muddied by a natural reality. That reality, as always, is the continuing un-equality of man.
To some, the future ‘ethnic/political’ relations are horrifying. To others, it is welcomed as natural, inevitable, and sound practical race-culture politics. To those moderns which are fearful of this trend, they mask themselves with self-righteous condemnation of all those who seek a different path. They point to the ‘democratization’ of Eastern Europe. But that should not deter us long, if at all, since it is precisely because eastern Europe was breaking apart along racial lines that any change in the political environment was necessitated. The role of money was secondary. Race was primary. The once great Soviet Empire, like her mirrored sister, America, has finally realized that ethnic ‘groups’ (i.e. Biological nations) must determine their own future and political realizations – based on their organic needs and will-to-express. The Modern knew this, does know this, and is precisely why he has kept the West confused, continually fighting himself over who is going to be the greatest democracy; who is going to bend over backwards in helping all others but that of his own kind. To those in America, the Modern would have us believe that Europe will be weakened by the apparent separation of its individual collective states – nothing could be further from the truth! In reality, the Western race-culture of ‘old’ Europe will become stronger than it has ever been. The casting aside of years of forced assimilation has, or will produce, a nation of truly epic proportions. The Modern shudders at the thought.
Isolation tends to mark the race-culture with will, strength, and a will-to-power that will, with time, create a positive destiny. In this light, must America, also, decide its own destiny. But only if America, truly, remains a higher-culture. If she is not, then the coming isolation from her sister, Europe, will dim her epoch making flame to that of a dead ember.
The Balkanization of the contiguous ‘states’ within the boundaries of these United States is unacceptable to most, if not all those that carry the flame of the Modern. To all and sundry, the cry is heard: ‘to all one god’, ‘to all one people’, ‘to all one government’. This is, and has become, the rallying wail of the Modern; this is their imperative. They must, their power depends upon it. Yet, the ancient drive to realize, to actualize a particular race-culture with the necessary developments required to succeed in a vast world of competition is the kind of struggle the Modern will, at any cost, keep Western man from attaining. The Modern, however, is wearing thin; he fears the technics of organism. The Cosmopolis, that crowning achievement of the Modern, has been split between the visible lines of racial demarcation from their very inception, and the visible realities of equality and diversity in the coming Babel of the 21st Century.
In the past, this presented little problem – he [the Modern] controlled his environment – now, however, it is controlled by those ‘individual’ racial units who, with political power have, ipso facto, created a balkanization effect with no thought whatsoever of their future excepting the single imperative of breaking up the political state of the Western. The Modern, of course, supports and aids in its implementation. In the ‘cities’, they already have control. Their very numbers demand this control – the mob now in control. Democracy, once again, serves the Modern, yes, and even the Western who created it, and allows his technics to pass from him to the mob of the Modern. The Western [man] cannot complain. Nay! He must welcome this passing – it is, after all, the ‘people’s choice’! Freedom of choice, however, cuts both ways, but not always in those ways predicted. The Nationalist as well, has made his choice.
It is now true, unlike any time in our history, that large segments of the Western race-culture of America has realized the loss of political power as a ‘race-cultural unit’. Let us be more specific: members of white European stock have not only decreased numerically through abortion, self-denial, and intellectual decisions to ‘decrease’ family size, and fundamental encouragement of non-European immigration over that of European immigration has, most assuredly, put the ‘white race’ at an untenable crossroad: his extinction as a ‘voting majority’ is already here; and extinction of his racial sovereignty follows close behind. Let the Modern say what he will; let him denounce this position until he is blue in the face; the fact remains, that Western man has neither the power to change a thing on the National level, nor the power to claim any sovereignty other than what his ‘status’ as a de facto citizen of the republic – with rights and privileges granted by those who hold power over him – even by those who neither know his past nor have any inclination or knowledge of how his future must be formed and shaped to guarantee his future. Western man, those white Europeans of America, is facing a future directed by others. The Western fecund rate, the ability to create and raise children, is ever decreasing, and now forces one to contemplate the reality of a non-western increase in real numbers, which equate into a real increase of voting power – this simply is the way of nature. The collective ‘units’ of the various diverse race-cultures feel the present presence of their own power; the resultant spin-off leads, of necessity, towards separation. So, also the Western. Where will this trend lead us? It is the question of a new century; of a new future – Destiny awaits in vitro.