The International Dynamics and Viability
The White Nationalist gets a good chuckle when opposition forces or simple ignorance champions the attack against ‘white nationalists’ as anti-internationalist. Nothing is further from the truth. The inter-nationalist character of White Nationalism is well documented, and has been a viable and healthy component of ethno-nationalism for a hundred years or more; over the past forty years, its has congealed into a defined and politically adept premise of the present-day white nationalist.
In Europe, for instance, the developmental momentum of nationalistic thought, a sure indicator of traditionalism, is seen in virtually all of its communities, and the strongest aspect of this reaffirmation is caused by the importation of ‘labour’ – even if sharing the same racial components if coming from a ‘foreign’ country – at the expense of the indigenous work-force; this aspect of ‘tribalism’ has, traditionally, been a major impediment to the idea of a working relationship with other ethno-states, but with the increase in white nationalism in both the ‘states’ as well as other ‘western’ countries, the common understanding of Pan-Nationalism, or internationale confederations, has made itself known throughout the world with some telling influence. This is just the beginning.
As ethno-nationalists continue to be bombarded in their home countries with draconian and ‘anti-democratic’ hysteria and legal abuses, as well as continued discrimination in the political realm, such as the banning of political parties (such as Hungary, Germany, Poland, Russia, Sweden, all in greater or lesser degrees), and the heavy draconian monitoring of ‘social sites’, musical venues, political assembly and the like, it is obvious that the authoritarian ‘state’ has only one agenda: to keep those of western stock alone, marginalized, and bereft of all the so-called democratic traditions of their nation-states. Europe, after all, has fought for the ‘rights of man’ far longer than America, and simply lacked the ‘fresh start’ afforded their kinsmen here, in the ‘united states’. Be that as it may, ‘white nationalism’, as a philosophy, is shared the world-over, however much the unique applications of ‘nationalism must affect specific national directives. Pan-Nationalism, in the context of pan-ethno-nationalism is shared by the majority of racial activists and thinkers, and presently far out-weighs any possible division within this world-wide community.
From a purely lineal or political angle, this must continue unabated for all our disparate parts to succeed individually.
In certain countries, there has been some success after years of struggle, and those parties, which have some semblance of political tradition (Italy, Sweden, and Germany/Austria come to mind) are slowly making their presence known against tremendous odds. With the closing of American borders and the insulated national, or should we say, the imprisoned white ethno-state, it is more important than ever to maintain cultural and personal relationships within and without the mainstream political parties of each nation, and endeavor to facilitate a healthy relation with one another, internationally: and why not? In common, we all share ‘blood and bone’, our traditions, even when flavored with territorial iconoclastic and regional imperatives, marks us with similar distinctions which, if seen from a distance, would appear to be related in thought and action; our systems of jurisprudence have common ground (although here, in the US, it is beyond our ethnic-traditions of the past, and well beyond the decency of Anglo-Saxon law, as discussed in previous works), our food shares many of the same tastes and smells, and our spiritual inclinations have the same root and stock. In short, white nationalism, as a philosophy, is shared by the majority of the members of the Western ethno-state – that is, world wide.
This element, that of internationalism, is not unique, for in another time, white America and Europe shared Trade, Culture, Science, education, law, industrial advances, and literary import with each other, as was common and good for all the earth, until greed and envy entered into the hearts and minds of individuals not content with the prosperity and enjoyment of themselves and their own people – economic internationalism, which saw its shadow in the ‘arms races’ of yesteryear, as well as advances in personal ‘accumulated’ personal wealth with concomitant international agendas, polluting the natural affinities of our related peoples – this must be fought at every opportunity, for the best interests and moral future of ourselves and our collective ethno-states, for we are all connected, no matter what is said about us, and this is a good thing.
Do not let religion, territory, or regional history keep one from the overall imperative: A free and sovereign ethno-state for each traditional ‘tribal unit’ – and even new ones if that is what it takes.
Thus, we are presented with a reaffirmation of our ancient folk-ways – a world-revolution if you will – in which we see the awakening of traditional ethno-states, of racial types, on the order of magnitude not seen in generations; this awakening is the just and commonsense counter-movement against the liberalizing ‘internationalist’ who gained his fateful foothold in the last century, his conquest of tradition and culture the world over, and his economic supremacy which saw such despair in the hearts of millions, and drove them into the chains of the Bolshevist, communist, imperialist and internationalism directed, sadly, by the controlled demos of certain western authorities who, in turn, had been taken over by the same disease; all of this leads, ineluctably, to the elimination of racial consciousness and traditional folk-ways.