What Are The Tenets Of White Nationalism?

What Are The Tenets Of White Nationalism?

Frank L. DeSilva

Word Count 1,027

Over the last Year, many have come to me, asking me what, exactly, are the ‘tenets’ of White Nationalism.

Firstly, I ask if they have read the complete Work. Mostly, these individuals have only read excerpts, here and there.

It is not a good idea, with any work, to take bits and pieces, put it together, and then introduce it to the public so, with that in mind, below is partial presentation of the 25 Points, as constructed in this Work.

The Reader should recognize, at the outset, that these ’25 points’ are, like all presentations of this type, workable and valuable, as seen by those who, collectively, added to the corpus. Likewise, as I have said before in the above Work, this collective effort is but a ‘watermark’, and as the future progresses, the final Edit, as it were, is yet to be penned.

Taken as a whole, however, these elements will not be modified in any significant way.

In case anyone who is reading this presentation or idea, for the first time, it should be noted that White Nationalism is not a rhetorical concept, and that this ideology is intended to become the foundation of a Political process, indeed, has become the foundation of a political movement. The implementation of this process is, as always, up to those spirits who have the insight and courage, to create and present this to the world.

For now, digest and reflect.


Continue reading “What Are The Tenets Of White Nationalism?”

So, You Want A Homeland?

The Promise of a New Land:

The belief in Territory

Frank L. DeSilva Word Count 1,538

Diverse populations, that is, in a racial sense, no matter the cosmopolis of its language, has never realized a higher culture in the real sense, at least not for long. The many attempts, including the great “experiment” of the United States, have failed. The antagonisms are many. The brutalization of the many inhabitants by each opposing “group” is natural, albeit dysfunctional, and cannot support the integrity of any given organized culture. The platitudes given the populace by its erstwhile leaders are political posturing, plain and simple. They elect to sympathize with “special interest groups” in order to gain an advantage in a “numerical” democracy; this does not promote the real interests of the “host-race” on which mores, spirit, and destiny-will the Nation/Culture was founded. This exacerbates this entire dysfunctional process. Anyone who questions this process is considered a radical by the existing order.

In ROTW, the entire concept of a rising, fledgling, and independent people, presupposes Summita natural and independent Political State. Without a state, there can be no real affirmation of either independence, nor freedom. As such, the dream of many of those Western men and women must, at all costs, come to grips with the reality of both a natural and geographical  State. To this end, to be sure, have been many and varied attempts to distill, and explain to the various adherents and visionaries which encompass the racial/nationalist struggle for a homeland dedicated, and created for members of the West – just as had their forefathers and mothers realized, of yesteryear.

The Rise of a New West is predicated on it.

I have often said that “…the search for Land is over…”, and so it is.

As this discussion has been in the forefront of many personal, as well as public discussions and debates, and seeing the smallest of movements, once again, in the reemergence of this basic, and pivotal role of White Nationalist policy, as it relates to the future growth of a national direction.

Moreover, I feel it is opportune to bring this discussion to the fore again, although in a more oblique, and revised version.

Rather than quote all the ‘usual suspects’, erudite and world-worn though they are, and most certainly deserve our attention, such as Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Plato, Aristotle, Jefferson, Adams, Jay, and even Franklin, I will try and encapsulate (even offer a few quotes…a mean feat, but remembering also, to assuage those who thrive off this obligatory bulwark of fact and faith) the construct, although not the methodology, of my antecedents, our forefathers, those who made us, who gave us this elusive and mercurial process of ‘thinking for ourselves’, and thereby creating, that environ most suitable for us and our children.

It is well and good that we, White Nationalists, proceed and direct our ideas and common-sense applications of form, as it were, to our fellows, those rudimentary and common-folk who, in actuality, are our neighbors, our wives and sisters, our work-place brethren and, most importantly, to ourselves. To inculcate ideas and forms of methodology are fine, in the main, and what other recourse can we count on? The innumerable words and phrases are, of course, a necessity, until that time that necessity, itself, requires more of us.

In my mind, the penultimate Idea, or as the converse may be attributed, is that Land, or in the abstract, ownership of land, is the absolute cornerstone of White Nationalist philosophy. Moreover, the realization that soil, unlike blood, is continuous, even when changed, superficially, by erosion or man-made enterprises; blood, on the other hand, may be changed, diluted and made more malleable by indifference and lack of responsible attention.

Therefore, it is Land, in its permanent and decidedly unique inference of human habitation, that our discussion relates to a more mundane, yet not so distant interaction with ourselves and our posterity. Land, in a Western ideation, is sacrosanct, a veritable ‘holy grail’ to those independent and sovereign souls who, among the larger body of the earths populace, see the harnessing of a ‘natural’ thing, to be a duty, a responsibility of a dutiful husband man, who would till the land, thereby bringing forth the substance of life, guaranteeing him and his family, the necessities of life and, by extension, those that come after.

Yes, and what comes after?

Those who have made the study of Natural Law a life-long pursuit have, almost to the man, decidedly come to the conclusion that it is longevity, by its very nature, is that which precludes the loss of sustained serfdom. Slavery is, by all accounts, a state of un-natural affairs, although is understood by such as Ragnar Redbeard and Darwin, as a state of nature, however unsavory it might be. Nevertheless, it is to longevity that we address ourselves, namely: Perpetuity.

To ‘hold land’ at the behest of a State, or any authority is, without reservation, opposed by White Nationalists. The revitalization of a racial state is predicated upon this simple realization.

Moreover, to secure Land, proper, is the basis for action of a free people:

the inhabitants of any country who are descended and derive a title to their estates from those who are subdued and had a government forced upon them against their free consents retain a right to the possession of their ancestors…for the first conqueror never having had a title to the land of that country, the people who are the descendants of, or claim under, those who were forced to submit to the yoke of a government by constraint have always a right to shake it off and free themselves from the usurpation or tyranny which the sword has brought in upon them…’ [§192]. ‘Their persons are free by a native right, and their properties, be they more or less, are their own and at their own disposal, and not at his’ [§194].

This, of course, leads the stouthearted to conclusions, ironic though it might appear to some of us, that:

No damage therefore, that men in the state of nature (as all princes and governments are in reference to one another) suffer from one another, can give a conqueror power to dispossess the posterity of the vanquished, and turn them out of that inheritance, which ought to be the possession of them and their descendants to all generations….¶184

Once again:

Their persons are free by a native right, and their properties, be they more or less, are their own and at their own disposal, and not at his. 1941

The insistence of tried and true methods, however, seem to have been passed by in the frenetic attempt to ‘convince’ our brethren of the ‘rightness’ of our cause; instead, we should, all of us, attempt to reaffirm the basis, yes the basic realizations of the primacy of our attempt to become a People, once again, by fostering, and inculcating every waking day, the realization that without that personal interdiction of our basic and most intrinsic need for a viable estate, firstly, of personal property, as well as the necessity to maintain this property, in perpetuity, is of the most permanent and incendiary qualities of White Nationalism.

I believe that most of us agree to two things:

  1. That a ‘place’, physical and identifiable, be a prerequisite to a future homeland/ethno-state’
  2. That a ‘physical’ and identifiable People populate, as the sole representatives of that people, this ‘particular’ place, so indicated.

This may be an inversion, to some, of ‘blood and soil’, but I feel it places the chicken before the egg; this does not, however, decrease the ideation of ‘blood and soul’, but only reinforces it.

White Nationalists know, or should know, that it was Law, both of the legal variety, as seen conditionally by our English forebears, as well as seen by those considering the natural variety, as the above quotes emphasize. Even Njal, in the Icelandic Saga’s, saw this clearly as “Me lögum skall land byggja og ólögum eya2,”which recognizes both a ‘discipline’ as well as a causual effect upon the relationship between the two elements.

One must, firstly, possess property, before one can lay claim legally to it.

This brings us to today’s effort to reclaim, as well as establish, a real territory, an ethno-state, in which we might begin, again, the long process of revitalizing our status as free and sovereign people; to accumulate wealth as our skills support, and begin the long and perilous route of establishing a viable Industrial America, that productive state in which we can, honestly, compete with ourselves, as well as others, to build a nation consonant with our advances in technology and our innate desires.

Once we have convinced our people of the ‘natural rights’ of possessing, in a generational setting, the environment in which we live, we may better and more forcibly, remain fixed to our ‘place’, thereby inculcating and making real, our duty and obligation to our Nation.

Such is the hope of White Nationalism for all our people.



National Pan-Aryanist Party – Position Paper, 1989, NPAP Press.

1 John Locke, Second Treatise of Government (1690)

2 “By law is the land built; by lawlessness (unlaw) destroyed”


White Nationalism: The Way Forward

White Nationalism: The Way Forward

Being a brief synopsis of the understanding and duties of the burgeoning

White Nationalist.

Frank L. DeSilva

Word Count 4,123

Forward into the Future.

The various manifestations of any traditional or revolutionary concept, idea, or methodology is largely due to national circumstance: popular [racial] identity, reactionary elements, visionary elements, financial depression and cultural insolvency.

In every epilogue of human events there exists, in stark relief, the metamorphosis of a People, or Folk-community. Regardless of any significant or insignificant attempt, or contribution too, any particular form of government, no matter the construct or principle, it is the people, the race-culture, which either is enslaved or liberated. Ironically, in terms of the former, slavery, to some, is ordered and constructive consumerism, which demands a certain consistency in social arrangements; to others, the lack of individualism, of sovereignty, marks the slave from the freeman. This balance has for millennia, swung from one extreme to the other.

This balancing act today, just as in yesteryear, is precarious one.

Continue reading “White Nationalism: The Way Forward”

Are Asians The New ‘People of Colour?’

The Songs of Jeong & Lee


Word Count 5,943

The late founder of modern Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, is famous for observing: “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.” This axiom led Yew to state, years later, that “multiculturalism will destroy America.” But it is not just through voting that multiculturalist tribalism expresses itself; it manifests itself through culture in a myriad of forms: activist journalism and theatrical plays being just two of many possible avenues.

With the recent, illustrative examples of Sarah Jeong and Young Jean Lee, we can now discern the shape of an emerging “Asian women hating on white men” trend among the Left’s hepcat sophisticates, one that is rapidly transitioning towards the actual dehumanization of whites. (We could add Inkoo Kang, a staff writer in Slate’s culture department, as another example, but that’s for another day.)

Continue reading “Are Asians The New ‘People of Colour?’”

The Nascent Beginning of Nationalism

The nascent Beginning of Nationalism

The origins of Life are consistent with the passage and evolution of its forms of Politics and Nation building; the first and foremost responsibility of each early individual was to his immediate family and, by extension, those nearest to him, this was his Folk-family, his Race. Any Nation, which was thereby considered and established by him, belonged to him in the only way possible:

By right of Birth.


Frank L. DeSilva

Word Count 3,379

It is said that we all are products of the Past. Everything we are, or can be, has been gifted to us by those who have gone before.

This is the first cause of all Nationalists. More precisely, this is the belief and knowledge of all Racial Nationalists who are called to stem the tide of suicide, murder, and retardation of their people who, as is known by all Nationalists, are their nation, entire, each belonging, by right of birth, that ever present gift, to that Once, and Future West.

Continue reading “The Nascent Beginning of Nationalism”

Prophetic Words On The Inevitable Struggle: How the West was Won

Prophetic Words On The Inevitable Struggle:

How the West was Won

Frank L. DeSilva

Word Count 7,237

[Editor’s Note: It is always profitable to look backwards, as it were, and see through the eyes of certain individuals who, as most have never been, in the ‘eye of the storm’, and given a certain perspective, that is then gifted to those with the ability to understand.

In going back over a work, written almost 30 years ago, We felt it timely, if it were presented, that those involved in our native conflagration, our struggle, might better view the over-all imperatives with which we are faced.

Rise of The West is such a work.

We extend, once again, our thanks to the Author, a stalwart defender of the West. The Staff]


The American West, in a strictly cultural sense, is broken up into distinct Nations.

At first glance, many who read this will wonder just what is being said, having no formal instruction other than what little they think they know from television and government ‘think tanks’. It is said that there are forty-eight ‘united states’ [within the Continental U.S.] but that each, voluntarily, make up the Nation as a political unit. In a purely political sense, this is apparent, yet, what is spoken of here is the precise components of biological nations, which inhabit that political unit called ‘america’. Each race-culture, such as Afro-american, Asian-american, Amer-Indian, Mexican-american, ad nauseum, constitute ‘specific’ [biological] nations which act, perform, congregate, celebrate, and decide political, moral, and social issues predicated upon those that are part of their particular race-culture in question. This is political reality.

Continue reading “Prophetic Words On The Inevitable Struggle: How the West was Won”

The Puritan Intellectual Tradition in America: Part 2

The Puritan Intellectual Tradition in America, Part 2: The Period of Ethnic Defense, 1890-1965

Word Count 1,742

Kevin MacDonald

The early part of the twentieth century was the high-water mark of Darwinism in the social sciences. It was common at that time to think that there were important differences between the races in both intelligence and moral qualities. Not only did races differ, they were in competition with each other for supremacy. For example, William Graham Sumner was a social Darwinist; he thought that social class and racial divisions as well as competition were part of the natural order of things. Writing in 1903, he noted that “the two races live more independently of each other now than they did” during the slave era.[1] Whereas later in the century, Jewish intellectuals led the battle against Darwinism in the social sciences, racialist ideas became part of the furniture of intellectual life—commonplace among intellectuals of all stripes, including a significant number of Jewish racial nationalists concerned about the racial purity and political power of the Jewish people. Many of them were Zionists who believed in the importance of Jewish racial purity (a Jewish homeland in Israel would prevent assimilation and intermarriage) and Jewish racial superiority .[2]

Continue reading “The Puritan Intellectual Tradition in America: Part 2”

South Africa: The Fight against the coming White Genocide

Race Building in South Africa

The Fight against the coming White Genocide

Frank L. DeSilva

Word Count 2,329

It has been said previously, that nation building is a relative form of Race-building. And so it is. Like a winning team, one that can not only run, but also win a race, it must have a workable and balanced relationship with the talents and healthy qualities inherent in the nature of one People, or race-culture, if the nation or race is to grow greater than the smallest of its parts. Let us use South Africa as such an example. Yes, South Africa, that land of harsh elements, rugged byways and highways, savagery, opulence, wealth, poverty, corruption and honor. A land that, by the Modern’s definition, is better served by the ‘diversity’ of racial inclusiveness rather, than it was before, a mainstay in the Western evolution; the White Tip, nestled in a far corner of a Black Continent.

Continue reading “South Africa: The Fight against the coming White Genocide”

Populist-Socialism: The Economy of the White Ethno-State

Populist-Socialism: The Economy of the White Ethno-State

J. J.

Economics of the Ethno-State

[Editor’s Note: It is timely that this discussion at Occidental Observer is taking place. Many who advocate for an ethnic region for Whites, an Ethno-State, are filled with the emotional fervor of the proselyte; yet few have any idea of the intrinsic mechanics. In similar fashion, this has also been dealt with here, and most certainly will require much understanding by the common man and woman.

In such an environment as we find ourselves in, every person must be educated and animated with the philosophy of White Nationalism, for an uneducated electorate is not conducive to a thriving and striving Folk. If you don’t want to be led, then you must learn how to think, and struggle for the position of leadership.]


Little consideration is given to the economic foundations of a White ethno-state. While many in the Alt-Right know conceptually what an ethno-state should be like in the abstract sense of demographics, the minutia of public and economic policy to obtain or maintain such a state is lost. While not exhaustive, the following paper is intended to steer conversations into more concrete terms addressing the economy of a White ethno-state. That is, an anti-materialist economy that serves the nation, versus the nation serving the economy in materialistic capitalism and socialist-communism. A Third Position meshing of populist and socialism is proposed.

Continue reading “Populist-Socialism: The Economy of the White Ethno-State”